Hudson v. Alford
This text of 45 S.E. 454 (Hudson v. Alford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “ Full payment of the fl. fa. founded on the judgment sought to-he reversed, pending a writ of error, it' not appearing that any supersedeas was sued out, is no cause for dismissing'the writ of error,'inasmuch as the defendant helow (the plaintiff in error here) would he entitled to recover the money hack in case the judgment should he reversed,” R. & D. Railroad Co. v. Buice, 88 Ga. 180.
2. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and there was no error requiring the granting of a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 S.E. 454, 118 Ga. 669, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-alford-ga-1903.