Hudson v. Adams

Fourth Circuit

Hudson v. Adams

139 F. App'x 567

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2005·No. No. 05-6325·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ervin L. Hudson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hudson v. Adams, No. CA-04-521-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [568]*568and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ervin L. Hudson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hudson v. Adams, No. CA-04-521-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [568]*568and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hudson v. Adams, 139 F. App'x 567 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

139 F. App'x 567 (Hudson v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related