Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 420
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 187
United States Customs Court·Decided January 21, 1958·No. No. 61481; protest 253086-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are not incandescent electric-light bulbs, that they are so-called “Bug” bulbs, that they are in chief value of metal, and that they are exclusively used with an insecticide as a vaporizing bulb for insect control in commercial plants and in households, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 420 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 420 (Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.