Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 433, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1919
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Cust. Ct. 116
United States Customs Court·Decided March 18, 1954·No. No. 57939; protest 206528-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise contained in case MJC No. 2, consisting of personal and household effects, reported by the landing inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact imported. In accordance with stipulation of counsel andiollowing the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portion of the merchandise as was reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 433, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1919 (cusc 1954).

32 Cust. Ct. 433 (Hudson Shipping Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.