Hudson River Yards Corp. v. Morano Construction Corp.
This text of 284 A.D. 894 (Hudson River Yards Corp. v. Morano Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this materialman’s action against the property owner, the general contractors and another to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, only a general contractor was served with the summons and complaint within sixty days after the filing of the lis pendens. The owner thereafter moved to vacate and discharge of record the lis pendens. (Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 120, 123.) Until the making of said motion there were negotiations toward settlement. Special Term denied the motion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 894, 134 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-river-yards-corp-v-morano-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1954.