Hudson Mfg. Co. v. United States
192 F. 920, 113 C.C.A. 625, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1982
This text of 192 F. 920 (Hudson Mfg. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hudson Mfg. Co. v. United States, 192 F. 920, 113 C.C.A. 625, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1982 (5th Cir. 1912).
Opinion
Where there is no proof that the words “Hudson’s Extract” have a well-known trade meaning, an imitation of vanilla marked “Hudson’s Extract,” without giving any indication of what the article is composed, shows a clear case of misbranding under the pure food law.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
192 F. 920, 113 C.C.A. 625, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-mfg-co-v-united-states-ca5-1912.