Hudson Mfg. Co. v. United States
192 F. 920, 113 C.C.A. 625, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1982
Opinion
Where there is no proof that the words “Hudson’s Extract” have a well-known trade meaning, an imitation of vanilla marked “Hudson’s Extract,” without giving any indication of what the article is composed, shows a clear case of misbranding under the pure food law.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudson Mfg. Co. v. United States, 192 F. 920, 113 C.C.A. 625, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1982 (5th Cir. 1912).
192 F. 920 (Hudson Mfg. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.