Home/Supreme Court/Hudson & Manhattan R. v. Cahill

Hudson & Manhattan R. v. Cahill

307 U.S. 640, 59 S. Ct. 1038
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 29, 1939
DocketNo. 925
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 307 U.S. 640 (Hudson & Manhattan R. v. Cahill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson & Manhattan R. v. Cahill, 307 U.S. 640, 59 S. Ct. 1038 (1939).

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [641]*641denied.'

Mr. William D. Whitney for petitioner. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Arnold, and Messrs. Robert L. Stern, Charles A. Horsky, .and Daniel W. Knowlton for Cahill et. al., respondents. Messrs. Ezra Brainerd, Jr. and Alex. M. Bull for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al., intervening-respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
126 F. Supp. 359 (S.D. New York, 1954)
Chicago, S. S. & S. B. R. R. v. Fleming
109 F.2d 419 (Seventh Circuit, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
307 U.S. 640, 59 S. Ct. 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-manhattan-r-v-cahill-scotus-1939.