Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. v. City of Jersey City

75 A.2d 923, 5 N.J. 434
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 23, 1950·Published

Opinion

5 N.J. 434 (1950)
75 A.2d 923

HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 2, 1950.
Decided October 23, 1950.

Mr. John Warren argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Aaron A. Melniker, Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, Mr. Nicholas S. Rago and Mr. Sydney L. Jacobs, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. John B. Graf, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. v. City of Jersey City, 75 A.2d 923, 5 N.J. 434 (N.J. 1950).

75 A.2d 923 (Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. v. City of Jersey City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hudson & Manhattan Railroad v. City of Jersey City
75 A.2d 923 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1950)