Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. v. City of Jersey City

75 A.2d 923, 5 N.J. 434
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 23, 1950
StatusPublished

This text of 75 A.2d 923 (Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. v. City of Jersey City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. v. City of Jersey City, 75 A.2d 923, 5 N.J. 434 (N.J. 1950).

Opinion

5 N.J. 434 (1950)
75 A.2d 923

HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 2, 1950.
Decided October 23, 1950.

Mr. John Warren argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Aaron A. Melniker, Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, Mr. Nicholas S. Rago and Mr. Sydney L. Jacobs, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. John B. Graf, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 7.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson & Manhattan Railroad v. City of Jersey City
75 A.2d 923 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 A.2d 923, 5 N.J. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-manhattan-r-co-v-city-of-jersey-city-nj-1950.