Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. v. City of Jersey City
This text of 75 A.2d 923 (Hudson & Manhattan R. Co. v. City of Jersey City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. John Warren argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Aaron A. Melniker, Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, Mr. Nicholas S. Rago and Mr. Sydney L. Jacobs, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. John B. Graf, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 A.2d 923, 5 N.J. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-manhattan-r-co-v-city-of-jersey-city-nj-1950.