Hudson Insurance v. David Morse & Associates, Inc.
This text of 81 A.D.3d 407 (Hudson Insurance v. David Morse & Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered January 27, 2010, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claims asserted by plaintiff Westchester, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Supreme Court correctly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing Westchester’s claims. Triable issues of material fact exist as to whether Westchester has standing as plaintiff Hudson’s contractual or equitable subrogee (Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Renwick, Freedman and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 A.D.3d 407, 916 N.Y.S.2d 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-insurance-v-david-morse-associates-inc-nyappdiv-2011.