Hudson Ins. Co. v. Yameen

181 N.E. 895, 124 Ohio St. 646, 124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 646, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 308
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 3, 1931
Docket22509
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 N.E. 895 (Hudson Ins. Co. v. Yameen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson Ins. Co. v. Yameen, 181 N.E. 895, 124 Ohio St. 646, 124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 646, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 308 (Ohio 1931).

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that the insurance policy involved herein contains language reasonably susceptible to different interpretations and hence will be given the construction most favorable to the assured. Farmers National Bank v. Delaware Insurance Co., 83 Ohio St., 309; Mumaw v. Western & Southern Life Insurance Co., 97 Ohio St., 1; Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Jones, 111 Ohio St., 84.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Preferred Acc. Ins. v. Rhodenbaugh
160 F.2d 832 (Sixth Circuit, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 N.E. 895, 124 Ohio St. 646, 124 Ohio St. (N.S.) 646, 1931 Ohio LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-ins-co-v-yameen-ohio-1931.