Hudson Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Merriam Gateway Associates

279 A.D.2d 611, 719 N.Y.S.2d 881

This text of 279 A.D.2d 611 (Hudson Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Merriam Gateway Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Merriam Gateway Associates, 279 A.D.2d 611, 719 N.Y.S.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

In two related actions to enforce a judgment of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Sussex County, filed June 12, 1997, the defendants in Action No. 2, Merriam Gateway Associates, a New Jersey Partnership, and Benjamin Oratz, appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated October 18, 1999, as denied their motion to dismiss that action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, Action No. 2 is not barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel (see, Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co., 65 NY2d 449).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are either without merit or improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see, Block v Magee, 146 AD2d 730). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Block v. Magee
146 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D.2d 611, 719 N.Y.S.2d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-electrical-contractors-inc-v-merriam-gateway-associates-nyappdiv-2001.