Hudson City Savings Bank v. Mattis

583 F. App'x 295
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 29, 2014·No. No. 14-1478·Published

Opinion

[296]*296Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David M. Mattis seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding the underlying foreclosure action to North Carolina state court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Subject to exceptions not applicable here, “fa]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012); see E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc., 722 F.3d 574, 581-83 (4th Cir.2013). Because the district court’s order does not fall within any of the exceptions provided by § 1447, the order is not appealable. We therefore dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hudson City Savings Bank v. Mattis, 583 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2014).

583 F. App'x 295 (Hudson City Savings Bank v. Mattis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc.
722 F.3d 574 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)