Hudson

168 F. 1021, 93 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4536
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 1909
DocketNo. 206
StatusPublished

This text of 168 F. 1021 (Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudson, 168 F. 1021, 93 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4536 (2d Cir. 1909).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A majority of the court are of the opinion that there is ¡not sufficient in the record to warrant a reversal of the decision of the .District Court. 163 Fed. 862. Decree is affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Hendrick Hudson
163 F. 862 (S.D. New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 F. 1021, 93 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-ca2-1909.