Hudnell v. Thames

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hudnell v. Thames

139 So. 502, 19 La. App. 19, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 227

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 16, 1932

DocketNo. 4103

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 502 (Hudnell v. Thames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudnell v. Thames, 139 So. 502, 19 La. App. 19, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 227 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

McGregor, j.

In this case the plaintiff alleges that defendant is indebted unto him in the sum of $2,075, and he prays for judgment against him in the same amount. It is evident that this court has no jurisdiction over the controversy ratione materise. It is therefore ordered that the case be transferred to the Supreme Court under provisions of Act No. 19 of 1912, within thirty days from the date on which the record in the case is returned to the clerk of the Eighth judicial district court, Grant parish..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGregor, j.

In this case the plaintiff alleges that defendant is indebted unto him in the sum of $2,075, and he prays for judgment against him in the same amount. It is evident that this court has no jurisdiction over the controversy ratione materise. It is therefore ordered that the case be transferred to the Supreme Court under provisions of Act No. 19 of 1912, within thirty days from the date on which the record in the case is returned to the clerk of the Eighth judicial district court, Grant parish..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 502, 19 La. App. 19, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudnell-v-thames-lactapp-1932.