Hudnall v. State

432 S.W.2d 910, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1085
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 16, 1968
DocketNo. 41646
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 432 S.W.2d 910 (Hudnall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hudnall v. State, 432 S.W.2d 910, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1085 (Tex. 1968).

Opinion

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $125.00 and three days in jail.

Prior to the trial of this cause, the State moved for dismissal of the allegation of the prior conviction alleged for jurisdictional purposes contained in the indictment and moved that appellant be tried on the remaining portion of the indictment, which was a misdemeanor count for driving while intoxicated.

While the record does not reflect that the court ever acted upon the State’s motion, it is shown that appellant waived a jury and pled guilty to the offense of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, a misdemeanor, and further agreed to stip[911]*911ulated testimony to said misdemeanor offense.

No grounds of error are set forth in a brief filed in the trial court as required by Art. 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

We have examined the record and find nothing contained therein which we should consider as unassigned error under Section 13 of said Article.

No question based on indigency is raised.

The judgment of the trial court is reformed under Art. 44.24, V.A.C.C.P., to show appellant’s conviction for misdemeanor driving while intoxicated, and as reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lujan v. State
664 S.W.2d 737 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
432 S.W.2d 910, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudnall-v-state-texcrimapp-1968.