Hudgins Contracting Co. v. Corley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hudgins Contracting Co. v. Corley

188 S.E. 736, 54 Ga. App. 694, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 731

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 27, 1936

Docket25569; 25570

StatusPublished

This text of 188 S.E. 736 (Hudgins Contracting Co. v. Corley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudgins Contracting Co. v. Corley, 188 S.E. 736, 54 Ga. App. 694, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 731 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Sutton, J.

The plaintiffs in these cases (defendants in error) were riding in the automobile being operated by John E. Smith, the defendant in error in Hudgins Contracting Co. v. Smith, ante, (188 S. E. 732), at the time of the collision between Smith’s automobile and the vehicle being operated by Hudgins Contracting Co. These two cases are here on exceptions to the overruling of the defendant’s general demurrers to the plaintiffs’ petitions. In so far as affected by g'eneral demurrer, the allegations of the petitions in' the present cases are identical with those in the case cited supra, and the ruling on the general demurrers in these cases is controlled by that decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sutton, J.

The plaintiffs in these cases (defendants in error) were riding in the automobile being operated by John E. Smith, the defendant in error in Hudgins Contracting Co. v. Smith, ante, (188 S. E. 732), at the time of the collision between Smith’s automobile and the vehicle being operated by Hudgins Contracting Co. These two cases are here on exceptions to the overruling of the defendant’s general demurrers to the plaintiffs’ petitions. In so far as affected by g'eneral demurrer, the allegations of the petitions in' the present cases are identical with those in the case cited supra, and the ruling on the general demurrers in these cases is controlled by that decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.E. 736, 54 Ga. App. 694, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudgins-contracting-co-v-corley-gactapp-1936.