Hudgens v. Barnhart
This text of 95 F. App'x 706 (Hudgens v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jerry W. Hudgens appeals a judgement affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s determination that Hudgens is not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. Hudgens argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) applied the wrong legal standard and that the decision is contrary to the evidence. It is undisputed that Hudgens is currently disabled; however, his application for disability benefits was denied on the basis that he failed to establish that the disability existed on December 31, 1991, the date that his insured status under the Social Security Act expired.
The ALJ applied the correct legal standard, and substantial evidence from medical records compiled by Hudgens’ treating physician supports the ALJ’s finding that Hudgens was capable of at least light work on the date that his insured status expired. Ripley v. Chater, 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir.1995); Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 237 (5th Cir.1994). The decision of the district court affirming the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 F. App'x 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudgens-v-barnhart-ca5-2004.