Hudes v. Hittleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hudes v. Hittleman

252 A.D. 766, 299 N.Y.S. 754, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6216

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 766 (Hudes v. Hittleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hudes v. Hittleman, 252 A.D. 766, 299 N.Y.S. 754, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of June 1, 1935, granting respondent’s motion to be relieved as attorney upon terms and conditions to be determined upon receipt of the referee’s report and referring the matter for the taking of proof as to the value of the attorney’s fees, affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Order of May 5, 1936, confirming the referee’s report and fixing a lien in the sum of $200, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with fifty dollars costs. No opinion. Order of June 12, 1936, resettling the order of May 5, 1936, and providing for a money judgment in the sum of $200, reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. In our opinion, it was beyond the power of the court to award' a' money judgment in this summary proceeding. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of June 1, 1935, granting respondent’s motion to be relieved as attorney upon terms and conditions to be determined upon receipt of the referee’s report and referring the matter for the taking of proof as to the value of the attorney’s fees, affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Order of May 5, 1936, confirming the referee’s report and fixing a lien in the sum of $200, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with fifty dollars costs. No opinion. Order of June 12, 1936, resettling the order of May 5, 1936, and providing for a money judgment in the sum of $200, reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. In our opinion, it was beyond the power of the court to award' a' money judgment in this summary proceeding. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 766, 299 N.Y.S. 754, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudes-v-hittleman-nyappdiv-1937.