Huddy's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Huddy's Estate

101 A. 818, 257 Pa. 528, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 773

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 16, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 396

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 101 A. 818 (Huddy's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huddy's Estate, 101 A. 818, 257 Pa. 528, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 773 (Pa. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The clearly expressed intention of the testator confines the distribution of the income from his estate to the children of his deceased niece, Eliza M. Fagan, and their issue. This was the correct conclusion of the Superior Court: Huddy’s Estate, 63 Pa. Superior Ct. 34. Helen Fagan Moore, a grandniece, having died without issue, her interest in the income terminated with her death: Rowland’s Est., 141 Pa. 553. Appeal dismissed and decree of Superior Court affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The clearly expressed intention of the testator confines the distribution of the income from his estate to the children of his deceased niece, Eliza M. Fagan, and their issue. This was the correct conclusion of the Superior Court: Huddy’s Estate, 63 Pa. Superior Ct. 34. Helen Fagan Moore, a grandniece, having died without issue, her interest in the income terminated with her death: Rowland’s Est., 141 Pa. 553. Appeal dismissed and decree of Superior Court affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A. 818, 257 Pa. 528, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huddys-estate-pa-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack