Huddlestun v. D. M. Osborne & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Huddlestun v. D. M. Osborne & Co.

1913 OK 101, 130 P. 146, 37 Okla. 18, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 969

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 11, 1913

Docket2457

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK 101 (Huddlestun v. D. M. Osborne & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huddlestun v. D. M. Osborne & Co., 1913 OK 101, 130 P. 146, 37 Okla. 18, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 969 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The petition in error was filed in this court March 23, 1911. Thereafter a motion to dismiss the appeal was filed by defendant in error, which motion was by the court overruled on June 18, 1912, of which action of the court counsel for plaintiff in error was informed. The case was *19 regularly assigned for submission at the December, 1912, term, of the court, but plaintiff in error has filed no brief; neither has he asked for an extension of time in which to file brief.

Upon the authority of Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co., 29 Okla. 9, 115 Pac. 1016, and other cases cited in the opinion of the court, the appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI