Huddleston v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Huddleston v. State

1936 OK CR 73, 60 P.2d 212, 59 Okla. Crim. 344, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 46

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 7, 1936·No. No. A-9071.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment assessed at- $50 and 30 days in jail.

A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on the 21st day of February, 1936. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment assessed at- $50 and 30 days in jail.

A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on the 21st day of February, 1936. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Huddleston v. State, 1936 OK CR 73, 60 P.2d 212, 59 Okla. Crim. 344, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 46 (Okla. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

1936 OK CR 73 (Huddleston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.