Huddleston, J, Pet v. Lamas
This text of Huddleston, J, Pet v. Lamas (Huddleston, J, Pet v. Lamas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
JERELL M. HUDDLESTON, : No. 61 WM 2014 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : MARIROSA LAMAS, LAWRENCE : COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, : LAWRENCE COUNTY DISTRICT : ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2014, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and the Application for an
Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa.
1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the
filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Huddleston, J, Pet v. Lamas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huddleston-j-pet-v-lamas-pa-2014.