Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty

186 A.D.2d 1064

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 1064 (Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty, 186 A.D.2d 1064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff contends that she was injured when a door at a mall owned by defendants closed too fast, causing her to fall. After a bifurcated trial on the issue of liability, the jury found defendants negligent and returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. We reverse. Plaintiff’s proof failed to establish that there was a dangerous condition or that there was any defect in the door (see, Birdsall v Montgomery Ward & Co., 109 AD2d 969, 971, affd 65 NY2d 913; Koch v Otis El. Co., 10 AD2d 464, 467). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Pooler, J. — Negligence.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Law-ton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff contends that she was injured when a door at a mall owned by defendants closed too fast, causing her to fall. After a bifurcated trial on the issue of liability, the jury found defendants negligent and returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. We reverse. Plaintiff’s proof failed to establish that there was a dangerous condition or that there was any defect in the door (see, Birdsall v Montgomery Ward & Co., 109 AD2d 969, 971, affd 65 NY2d 913; Koch v Otis El. Co., 10 AD2d 464, 467). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Pooler, J. — Negligence.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Law-ton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 1064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huddleson-v-upper-new-york-realty-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack