Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty

186 A.D.2d 1064
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 7, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff contends that she was injured when a door at a mall owned by defendants closed too fast, causing her to fall. After a bifurcated trial on the issue of liability, the jury found defendants negligent and returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. We reverse. Plaintiff’s proof failed to establish that there was a dangerous condition or that there was any defect in the door (see, Birdsall v Montgomery Ward & Co., 109 AD2d 969, 971, affd 65 NY2d 913; Koch v Otis El. Co., 10 AD2d 464, 467). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Pooler, J. — Negligence.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Law-ton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty, 186 A.D.2d 1064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 1064 (Huddleson v. Upper New York Realty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice v. University of Rochester Medical Center
55 A.D.3d 1325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)