HUDDLER v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

HUDDLER v. State

239 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588, 2007 WL 4106124

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 2007

DocketED 89410

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 S.W.3d 133 (HUDDLER v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HUDDLER v. State, 239 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1588, 2007 WL 4106124 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Huddler (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his post-conviction relief motion pursuant to Rule 24.035. Movant was convicted of class D felony of passing bad checks, in violation of Section 570.120 RSMo 2000, 1 and class C felony of stealing, in violation of Section 570.030. Movant was sentenced to concurrent terms of four year and five year imprisonment, respectively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI