Huddle v. Worthington

Ohio Supreme Court

Huddle v. Worthington

1 Ohio 424

DecidedDecember 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ohio 424 (Huddle v. Worthington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huddle v. Worthington, 1 Ohio 424 (Ohio 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

We are of opinion, that an action of covenant can not be sustained upon the condition of a bond like this, separated, as it is in the declaration, from the penal or obligatory part of the bond. It might be different, if the entire bond was declared on, as in the -case in 1 Munford, stating that the covenant was made under the penalty in the obligatory part specified.

Judgment must be for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

We are of opinion, that an action of covenant can not be sustained upon the condition of a bond like this, separated, as it is in the declaration, from the penal or obligatory part of the bond. It might be different, if the entire bond was declared on, as in the -case in 1 Munford, stating that the covenant was made under the penalty in the obligatory part specified.

Judgment must be for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ohio 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huddle-v-worthington-ohio-1824.