Hud Oil & Refining Co. v. Oklahoma City

1934 OK 94, 30 P.2d 169, 167 Okla. 457, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 567
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 20, 1934·No. 22244·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

ANDREWS, J.

The only issue presented on appeal in this cause which was presented in the trial court, which granted an injunction, was determined by this court in cause numbered 21722, C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Oklahoma City, this day de *458 cided, 167 Okla. 384, 29 P. (2d) 952. The rule therein stated is applied herein. Therein we applied the rule stated by this court in Gant et al. v. Oklahoma City, 150 Okla. 86, 6 P. (2d) 1065, and Gant et al. v. Oklahoma City et al., 160 Okla. 62, 15 P. (2d) 833, and by the Supreme Court oí the United States in Gant et al. v. Oklahoma City et al., 289 U. S. 98, 77 L. Ed. 1058, 53 S. Ct. 530.

There is no error in the judgment of the trial court, and it is in all things affirmed.

RILEY, O. J., CULLISON., V. O. J., and SWINDALL and O'SBORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hud Oil & Refining Co. v. Oklahoma City, 1934 OK 94, 30 P.2d 169, 167 Okla. 457, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 567 (Okla. 1934).

1934 OK 94 (Hud Oil & Refining Co. v. Oklahoma City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seal v. Corporation Commission
725 P.2d 278 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1986)
State v. Johnston
1977 OK CR 66 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1977)
Utility Supply Co., Inc. v. City of Broken Arrow
1975 OK 106 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1975)
Doyle v. State
1973 OK CR 282 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1973)
Keaton v. Brown
1935 OK 207 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Courter Oil Co. v. Oklahoma City
1934 OK 209 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Morgan Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma City
1934 OK 216 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)