Huck v. Mo. Baptist Med. Ctr.
This text of 571 S.W.3d 243 (Huck v. Mo. Baptist Med. Ctr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard Huck ("Plaintiff") appeals from the summary judgment and the judgment entered on a jury verdict against him on his claims against Missouri Baptist Medical Center and Metropolitan Sewer District ("MSD"). There was no error of law in granting summary judgment to MSD on grounds that it is entitled to sovereign immunity. There was no instructional error warranting reversal of the judgment entered in favor of Missouri Baptist after a jury trial. We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
571 S.W.3d 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huck-v-mo-baptist-med-ctr-moctapp-2019.