Home/New York Court of Appeals/Huck v. City of Newburgh

Huck v. City of Newburgh

744 N.E.2d 139, 95 N.Y.2d 929, 721 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3575
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 30, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 744 N.E.2d 139 (Huck v. City of Newburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huck v. City of Newburgh, 744 N.E.2d 139, 95 N.Y.2d 929, 721 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3575 (N.Y. 2000).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made on behalf of Kenneth Lopez, dismissed upon the ground that such movant is not a party aggrieved (see, CPLR 5511); motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made on behalf of the City of Newburgh, dismissed upon the ground that as to that party, the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Cross motion for leave to appeal by Cara Huck denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shields v. City of New York
141 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Kelley
306 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
744 N.E.2d 139, 95 N.Y.2d 929, 721 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huck-v-city-of-newburgh-ny-2000.