Huck v. City of Newburgh
744 N.E.2d 139, 95 N.Y.2d 929, 721 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3575
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made on behalf of Kenneth Lopez, dismissed upon the ground that such movant is not a party aggrieved (see, CPLR 5511); motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made on behalf of the City of Newburgh, dismissed upon the ground that as to that party, the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Cross motion for leave to appeal by Cara Huck denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huck v. City of Newburgh, 744 N.E.2d 139, 95 N.Y.2d 929, 721 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3575 (N.Y. 2000).
744 N.E.2d 139 (Huck v. City of Newburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shields v. City of New York
141 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Kelley
306 A.D.2d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)