Hubert v. Purkett
This text of 165 S.W.3d 585 (Hubert v. Purkett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dewayne Hubert (Appellant) appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The appeal is dismissed.
Appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court. The petition was denied and Appellant has appealed to this Court. In response, the State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending this Court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. Appellant has not filed a response to the motion.
[586]*586Here, Appellant seeks 'to appeal from the circuit court’s judgment Mgnying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. An appeal does not lie from the denialvof a petition for habeas corpus. Blackmon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 97 S.W.3d 458 (Mo. banc 2003); McDermott v. State, 120 S.W.3d 261, 262 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). If we lack jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Fischer v. City of Washington, 55 S.W.3d 372, 377 (Mo.App. E.D.2001).
A petitioner’s remedy where a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied is to file a new writ petition in a higher court. Webster v. Purkett, 110 S.W.3d 832, 837 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). Appellant has not filed a new writ petition.
The appeal is dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 S.W.3d 585, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 997, 2005 WL 1530003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-v-purkett-moctapp-2005.