Hubert v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hubert v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

39 A.D.2d 549, 332 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4980

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 549 (Hubert v. Fireman's Fund Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hubert v. Fireman's Fund Insurance, 39 A.D.2d 549, 332 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a declaratory judgment action, the defendant insurance companies appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 15, 1970, and from an order of the same court, entered March 2, 1971, which held that the injuries sustained by defendant Dorothy Graseck on a minibike owned by the plaintiffs rendered defendant Fireman’s Fund liable under the uninsured motorists’ clause of its policy and the other insurance companies liable under their homeowners’ liability policy, and denied a motion to vacate the judgment and for a new trial. Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs-respondents. (See, Lalomia v. Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co., 35 A D 2d 114). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a declaratory judgment action, the defendant insurance companies appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 15, 1970, and from an order of the same court, entered March 2, 1971, which held that the injuries sustained by defendant Dorothy Graseck on a minibike owned by the plaintiffs rendered defendant Fireman’s Fund liable under the uninsured motorists’ clause of its policy and the other insurance companies liable under their homeowners’ liability policy, and denied a motion to vacate the judgment and for a new trial. Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs-respondents. (See, Lalomia v. Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co., 35 A D 2d 114). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 549, 332 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-v-firemans-fund-insurance-nyappdiv-1972.