Hubert Tyrill v. Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc.

Second Circuit

Hubert Tyrill v. Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc.

266 F.2d 27, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3962

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 1959

Docket25467

StatusPublished

This text of 266 F.2d 27 (Hubert Tyrill v. Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hubert Tyrill v. Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc., 266 F.2d 27, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3962 (2d Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

266 F.2d 27

Hubert TYRILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 237, Docket 25467.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 6, 1959.
Decided April 28, 1959.

Morris Hirschhorn, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Francis X. Byrn, New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, and J. Ward O'Neill, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The denial of an injunction constitutes an appealable order. 28 U.S.C.A. 1292(a)(1). We think the lucid and wellreasoned opinion of Judge Ryan, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 172 F.Supp. 363, is a complete answer to the plaintiff's contentions here.

The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI