Hubert-Toussaint v. Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation
This text of Hubert-Toussaint v. Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation (Hubert-Toussaint v. Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
NATHALIE HUBERT- § TOUSSAINT, § No. 269, 2020 § Defendant Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below–Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § ROUNDPOINT MORTGAGE § C.A. No. K19L-03-014 SERVICING CORPORATION, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: December 15, 2020 Decided: January 11, 2021
ORDER
It appears to the Court that, on December 1, 2020, the Chief Deputy Clerk
issued a notice, sent by certified mail, to the appellant, Nathalie Hubert-Toussaint,
to show cause why her appeal should not be dismissed for her failure to file an
opening brief and appendix. Hubert-Toussaint received the notice to show cause on
December 4, 2020. A timely response to the notice to show cause was due on or
before December 14, 2020. Hubert-Toussaint has not responded to the notice to
show cause, nor has she filed an opening brief. Dismissal of the appeal is therefore
deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hubert-Toussaint v. Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-toussaint-v-roundpoint-mortgage-servicing-corporation-del-2021.