Hubert Morelock v. The Ncr Corporation

Sixth Circuit

Hubert Morelock v. The Ncr Corporation

555 F.2d 1348, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13350, 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 998

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 1977

Docket75-2220

StatusPublished

This text of 555 F.2d 1348 (Hubert Morelock v. The Ncr Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hubert Morelock v. The Ncr Corporation, 555 F.2d 1348, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13350, 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 998 (6th Cir. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

555 F.2d 1348

16 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 998

Hubert MORELOCK et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The NCR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 75-2220, 75-2282.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

May 17, 1977.

Before WEICK and ENGEL, Circuit Judges, and LAMBROS,* District judge.

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on Appellants' petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. The Secretary of Labor has joined in this petition as amicus curiae.

No judge of this Court having requested a vote on the suggestion that the petition be considered en banc, and this Court having considered said petition and finding the case at bar, 546 F.2d 682, to be in accord with the recent cases of Rogers v. Exxon Research and Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834 (3rd Cir. 1977) and Pons v. Lorillard, 549 F.2d 950 (4th Cir. 1977),1

IT IS ORDERED that the petition be, and is, hereby denied.

*

The Honorable Thomas D. Lambros, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

1

Compare Morelock v. NCR Corp., 6 Cir., 546 F.2d 682, 689 nn. 16, 17 with Rogers v. Exxon Research and Engineering Co., supra at 839 and Pons v. Lorillard, supra at 951 n.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

555 F.2d 1348

16 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 998

Hubert MORELOCK et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The NCR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 75-2220, 75-2282.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

May 17, 1977.

Before WEICK and ENGEL, Circuit Judges, and LAMBROS,* District judge.

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on Appellants' petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. The Secretary of Labor has joined in this petition as amicus curiae.

No judge of this Court having requested a vote on the suggestion that the petition be considered en banc, and this Court having considered said petition and finding the case at bar, 546 F.2d 682, to be in accord with the recent cases of Rogers v. Exxon Research and Engineering Co., 550 F.2d 834 (3rd Cir. 1977) and Pons v. Lorillard, 549 F.2d 950 (4th Cir. 1977),1

IT IS ORDERED that the petition be, and is, hereby denied.

*

The Honorable Thomas D. Lambros, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

1

Compare Morelock v. NCR Corp., 6 Cir., 546 F.2d 682, 689 nn. 16, 17 with Rogers v. Exxon Research and Engineering Co., supra at 839 and Pons v. Lorillard, supra at 951 n.3

14 Fair empl.prac.cas. 518, 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,466, 1 Employee Benefits Ca 1537 Gladys E. Rogers and Margaret A. Rogers, as Co-Executrices of the Estate of Dilworth T. Rogers, in No. 76-1115, Cross-Appellants in No. 76-1114 v. Exxon Research and Engineering Company, a Delaware Corporation, in No. 76-1115, Cross-Appellee in No. 76-1114

550 F.2d 834 (Third Circuit, 1977)

Morelock v. NCR Corp.

546 F.2d 682 (Sixth Circuit, 1976)

Morelock v. NCR Corp.

555 F.2d 1348 (Sixth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 F.2d 1348, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13350, 16 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-morelock-v-the-ncr-corporation-ca6-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack