Hubert Lee Yancey v. Union Carbide Corporation and C. W. Covington
353 F.2d 672
Opinion
This diversity personal injury case, having resulted in a judgment for the defendant on jury answers to special interrogatories, must be affirmed. There was ample evidence from which the jury could find contributory negligence by the plaintiff causing the injury complained of.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hubert Lee Yancey v. Union Carbide Corporation and C. W. Covington, 353 F.2d 672 (5th Cir. 1966).
353 F.2d 672 (Hubert Lee Yancey v. Union Carbide Corporation and C. W. Covington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Albert P. Moretti
353 F.2d 672 (Second Circuit, 1965)