Hubert Lee Yancey v. Union Carbide Corporation and C. W. Covington
353 F.2d 672
This text of 353 F.2d 672 (Hubert Lee Yancey v. Union Carbide Corporation and C. W. Covington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hubert Lee Yancey v. Union Carbide Corporation and C. W. Covington, 353 F.2d 672 (5th Cir. 1966).
Opinion
This diversity personal injury case, having resulted in a judgment for the defendant on jury answers to special interrogatories, must be affirmed. There was ample evidence from which the jury could find contributory negligence by the plaintiff causing the injury complained of.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Albert P. Moretti
353 F.2d 672 (Second Circuit, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
353 F.2d 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-lee-yancey-v-union-carbide-corporation-and-c-w-covington-ca5-1966.