Hubert Lee James v. Continental Training Services, Incorporated, T/a Superior Training John Doe Larry Cho

Fourth Circuit

Hubert Lee James v. Continental Training Services, Incorporated, T/a Superior Training John Doe Larry Cho

73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40380, 1995 WL 761047

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 27, 1995

Docket95-2420

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 357 (Hubert Lee James v. Continental Training Services, Incorporated, T/a Superior Training John Doe Larry Cho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hubert Lee James v. Continental Training Services, Incorporated, T/a Superior Training John Doe Larry Cho, 73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40380, 1995 WL 761047 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Hubert Lee JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CONTINENTAL TRAINING SERVICES, INCORPORATED, t/a Superior
Training; John Doe; Larry Cho, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2420.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided: Dec. 27, 1995.

Hubert Lee James, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his complaint alleging constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988), and invoking supplemental jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. James v. Continental Training Services, Inc., No. CA-95-593 (E.D. Va. June 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Hubert Lee JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CONTINENTAL TRAINING SERVICES, INCORPORATED, t/a Superior
Training; John Doe; Larry Cho, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2420.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided: Dec. 27, 1995.

Hubert Lee James, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his complaint alleging constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988), and invoking supplemental jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. James v. Continental Training Services, Inc., No. CA-95-593 (E.D. Va. June 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40380, 1995 WL 761047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-lee-james-v-continental-training-services-i-ca4-1995.