Hubert James Putt v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney General of the United States

394 F.2d 513
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 1968
Docket25503_1
StatusPublished

This text of 394 F.2d 513 (Hubert James Putt v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hubert James Putt v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney General of the United States, 394 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In a well considered opinion, the trial court denied appellant relief on his suits for injunction against alleged improper practices, obtaining in the jails within the judicial district in which federal prisoners were being held prior to trial. Although appellant also alleged grounds *514 for relief under Section 2255, the trial court separated the injunction proceedings from the Section 2255 petition. Therefore, only the order on the denial of the injunctive relief is before us for consideration.

For the reasons sufficiently set forth in the trial court’s opinion, this judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 F.2d 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-james-putt-v-ramsey-clark-attorney-general-of-the-united-states-ca5-1968.