Hubert Grey McCullars v. United States

352 F.2d 307
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 1966
Docket22209_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 352 F.2d 307 (Hubert Grey McCullars v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hubert Grey McCullars v. United States, 352 F.2d 307 (5th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a conviction and sentence of three years on an indictment *308 charging a conspiracy to violate the internal revenue laws having to do with distilled spirits. Each of the errors assigned has been carefully considered and found to be without merit. There was no abuse of discretion in denying the motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of Alabama. The error based on the procedure used with respect to the plea of guilty entered by a co-defendant is without substance, as are the errors based on the admission and rejection of evidence. The charge on entrapment as given was proper under the circumstances, and the argument of the prosecutor which is claimed as prejudicial was adjusted to the defenses and evidence offered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harcon Barge Co. v. M/V J. B. Chauvin
487 F. Supp. 187 (N.D. Mississippi, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 F.2d 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-grey-mccullars-v-united-states-ca5-1966.