Hubert Earl Hoffler v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, Ruben Pierce v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary

411 F.2d 608
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 16, 1969
Docket11235_1
StatusPublished

This text of 411 F.2d 608 (Hubert Earl Hoffler v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, Ruben Pierce v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hubert Earl Hoffler v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, Ruben Pierce v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, 411 F.2d 608 (4th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

411 F.2d 608

Hubert Earl HOFFLER, Appellant,
v.
C. C. PEYTON, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, Appellee.
Ruben PIERCE, Appellant,
v.
C. C. PEYTON, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, Appellee.

No. 11234.

No. 11235.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1969.

Decided May 16, 1969.

David Rudovsky, Philadelphia, Pa., (court-appointed) for appellants.

Reno S. Harp, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Virginia (Robert Y. Button, Atty. Gen. of Virginia, on brief) for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Hubert Earl Hoffler and Ruben Pierce appeal from an order of the district court denying their petitions for writs of habeas corpus.

Petitioners' sole claim for relief is that they were denied the effective assistance of counsel at their trial resulting in their conviction for robbery in April 1963. Their convictions were affirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Pierce v. Commonwealth, 205 Va. 528, 138 S.E.2d 28 (1964).

After a plenary hearing, the Circuit Court for the City of Suffolk denied their petitions for writs of habeas corpus. The Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed in an opinion that fully discusses their claim of ineffective representation. Hoffler v. Peyton, 207 Va. 302, 149 S.E.2d 893 (1966). When the petitioners sought relief in federal court, the district judge concluded that another plenary hearing was unnecessary. Hoffler v. Peyton, No. 5781, and Pierce v. Peyton, No. 5809 (E.D.Va., Dec. 30, 1966 (mem. dec.). We agree that a federal evidentiary hearing was unnecessary, Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963), and that the petitioners' claim does not rise to constitutional proportions. Sykes v. Commonwealth, 364 F.2d 314 (4th Cir. 1966); Root v. Cunningham, 344 F.2d 1 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 866, 86 S.Ct. 135, 15 L.Ed.2d 104 (1965).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Townsend v. Sain
372 U.S. 293 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Pierce v. Commonwealth
138 S.E.2d 28 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1964)
Hoffler v. Peyton
149 S.E.2d 893 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1966)
Hoffler v. Peyton
411 F.2d 608 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 F.2d 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubert-earl-hoffler-v-c-c-peyton-superintendent-of-the-virginia-state-ca4-1969.