Huberfeld v. Moore Bros. Wholesale Meats, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Huberfeld v. Moore Bros. Wholesale Meats, Inc.

34 A.D.2d 684, 311 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5006

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 684 (Huberfeld v. Moore Bros. Wholesale Meats, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huberfeld v. Moore Bros. Wholesale Meats, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 684, 311 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5006 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 10, 1969, as, on reconsideration, adhered to the previous determination denying his application for a general preference in trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and application granted. Under the facts disclosed in this record, we are of the opinion that it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the application. Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur; Benjamin, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order insofar as appealed from.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 10, 1969, as, on reconsideration, adhered to the previous determination denying his application for a general preference in trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and application granted. Under the facts disclosed in this record, we are of the opinion that it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the application. Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur; Benjamin, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order insofar as appealed from.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 684, 311 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huberfeld-v-moore-bros-wholesale-meats-inc-nyappdiv-1970.