Huber v. State
203 S.W.3d 236, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1496, 2006 WL 2864600
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, Leonard Huber, appeals the motion court’s denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huber v. State, 203 S.W.3d 236, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1496, 2006 WL 2864600 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
203 S.W.3d 236 (Huber v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.