Huber v. Liptak
This text of 45 A.2d 490 (Huber v. Liptak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Rielder, and reported at 136 N. J. Eq. 515.
For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, JJ. 10.'
For reversal — The Chiee-Justice, Colie, Reeund, JJ. 3.
For modification — McG-eehan, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.2d 490, 137 N.J. Eq. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huber-v-liptak-nj-1946.