Huber v. Liptak

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Huber v. Liptak

45 A.2d 490, 137 N.J. Eq. 454

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 5, 1946·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Rielder, and reported at 136 N. J. Eq. 515.

For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, JJ. 10.'

For reversal — The Chiee-Justice, Colie, Reeund, JJ. 3.

For modification — McG-eehan, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Rielder, and reported at 136 N. J. Eq. 515.

For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, JJ. 10.'

For reversal — The Chiee-Justice, Colie, Reeund, JJ. 3.

For modification — McG-eehan, J. 1.

Huber v. Liptak, 45 A.2d 490, 137 N.J. Eq. 454 (N.J. 1946).

Pincite

45 A.2d 490 (Huber v. Liptak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.