Huber v. Klebold Press

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Huber v. Klebold Press

112 N.Y.S. 203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 112 N.Y.S. 203 (Huber v. Klebold Press) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huber v. Klebold Press, 112 N.Y.S. 203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

Apart from the question of accord and satisfaction, in view of the denial of the treasurer of the defendant that the bill rendered to the plaintiff for extra work (the subject of its counterclaim) was ever returned, the check in full received and retained by the defendant may not be said to be an accord, there is no dispute as to amount due prior thereto. The Judgment dismissing the counterclaim may not be disturbed, as the trial- justice found that the extra work was not made necessary by any act or neglect on the part of the plaintiff. The claim of the plaintiff being otherwise admitted, the judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLEAN, J.

Apart from the question of accord and satisfaction, in view of the denial of the treasurer of the defendant that the bill rendered to the plaintiff for extra work (the subject of its counterclaim) was ever returned, the check in full received and retained by the defendant may not be said to be an accord, there is no dispute as to amount due prior thereto. The Judgment dismissing the counterclaim may not be disturbed, as the trial- justice found that the extra work was not made necessary by any act or neglect on the part of the plaintiff. The claim of the plaintiff being otherwise admitted, the judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 N.Y.S. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huber-v-klebold-press-nyappdiv-1908.