Huber v. Gaines

209 N.W. 412, 202 Iowa 69
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 21, 1926·Published

Opinion

MorliNG, J.

The abstract shows no exception to the ruling of the trial court here complained of. Were there such an exception, it could not be sustained. Young v. Stewart, 201 Iowa 301; Howe v. Briden, 201 Iowa 179; Kooistra v. Gibford, 201 Iowa 275, The order is — Affirmed.

De Geaff, C. J., and Evans and Albert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huber v. Gaines, 209 N.W. 412, 202 Iowa 69 (iowa 1926).

209 N.W. 412 (Huber v. Gaines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kooistra v. Gibford
207 N.W. 399 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1926)
Young v. Stewart
207 N.W. 401 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1926)
Howe v. Briden
206 N.W. 814 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1926)