Huber Engineered Woods, LLC v. Canal Insurance Company
This text of 700 S.E.2d 220 (Huber Engineered Woods, LLC v. Canal Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals holding that defendant has a duty to defend plaintiff in the underlying action at issue. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals vacating the portion of the trial court’s order of summary judgment that found defendant has a duty to indemnify plaintiff in the underlying action. This case is re *414 manded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
700 S.E.2d 220, 364 N.C. 413, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huber-engineered-woods-llc-v-canal-insurance-company-nc-2010.