Hubbell v. Broadwell
This text of 1 Wright 248 (Hubbell v. Broadwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The first judgment under the statute should have been for the amount of the debt, and an order to sell the mortgaged premises. This judgment made the debt a debt of record, instead of a debt by deed; 22 O. L. 232. Aftersale, in case ■of deficiency upon neto process, the law allowed a general judgment to be rendered for tire balance, and execution to issue as in other cases. The court erred, therefore, in giving the general judgment in the first instance, and for that error the judgment is reversed, with costs.
The other point, as to the power of a married woman to wave the service of process against her, it is not necessary now to decide.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wright 248, 1 Ohio Ch. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbell-v-broadwell-ohio-1833.