Home/Supreme Court/Hubbard v. Worcester Art Museum

Hubbard v. Worcester Art Museum

220 U.S. 605, 31 S. Ct. 718
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 17, 1911
DocketNo. 919
StatusPublished

This text of 220 U.S. 605 (Hubbard v. Worcester Art Museum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hubbard v. Worcester Art Museum, 220 U.S. 605, 31 S. Ct. 718 (1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. First National Bank v. Estherville, 215 U. S. 341, 346; Rogers v. Clark Iron Co., 217 U. S. 589; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 112, 116, 117, and cases cited; Cincinnati &c. Railway Co. v. Slade, 216 U. S. 78, 83. See Home for Destitute Children v. Peter [606]*606Brent Brigham Hospital, ante p. 603, decided at this term.

Mr. Charles A. Snow and Mr. Joseph H. Knight for the plaintiff in error. Mr. John Chipman Gray and Mr. Boland Gray for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)
212 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1909)
First National Bank v. City Council of Estherville
215 U.S. 341 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway v. Slade
216 U.S. 78 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Rogers v. Clark Iron Co.
217 U.S. 589 (Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 U.S. 605, 31 S. Ct. 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-worcester-art-museum-scotus-1911.