Hubbard v. Wentworth

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Hubbard v. Wentworth

3 N.H. 43

Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided February 15, 1824·Published

Opinion

By the court,

The motion, which the defendant has made ⅛ this case, cannot prevail. The exemption of the defend-¿.nt’s body in Massachusetts was. local, and cannot be regarded: here. 14 Johnson 346, Peck vs. Hozier.-2 do. 193, Smith vs. Spinola.—7 do. 117, White vs. Canfield.—1 D. & E 470, Maule vs. Murray.—1 Dallas 188, James vs. Allen.—2 East 453.—1 Caine’s Rep. 402.—3 Johnson 263.—11 do. 194,—1 Bos. & Puller 138, Melan vs. Fitzjames.-—5 Mass. Rep. 509.—10 do. 337.

Motion overruled,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court,

The motion, which the defendant has made ⅛ this case, cannot prevail. The exemption of the defend-¿.nt’s body in Massachusetts was. local, and cannot be regarded: here. 14 Johnson 346, Peck vs. Hozier.-2 do. 193, Smith vs. Spinola.—7 do. 117, White vs. Canfield.—1 D. & E 470, Maule vs. Murray.—1 Dallas 188, James vs. Allen.—2 East 453.—1 Caine’s Rep. 402.—3 Johnson 263.—11 do. 194,—1 Bos. & Puller 138, Melan vs. Fitzjames.-—5 Mass. Rep. 509.—10 do. 337.

Motion overruled,

Hubbard v. Wentworth, 3 N.H. 43 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1824).

Pincite

3 N.H. 43 (Hubbard v. Wentworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.