Hubbard v. United States
513 U.S. 959, 130 L. Ed. 2d 332, 115 S. Ct. 417, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 7530, 94 Daily Journal DAR 15316, 63 U.S.L.W. 3346, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8267
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 31, 1994·No. No. 94-172·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted limited to the following question: Whether petitioner’s convictions under 18 U.S.C. 1001 for knowingly making false statements in pleadings filed with the bankruptcy court are barred by the so-called “judicial functionn” exception of Section 1001.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hubbard v. United States, 513 U.S. 959, 130 L. Ed. 2d 332, 115 S. Ct. 417, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 7530, 94 Daily Journal DAR 15316, 63 U.S.L.W. 3346, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8267 (1994).
513 U.S. 959 (Hubbard v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Darlene Jenkins v. George W. Heintz and Bowman, Heintz, Boscia & McPhee
124 F.3d 824 (Seventh Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Arthur David Lemaster
54 F.3d 1224 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Tropic Seas, Inc.
887 F. Supp. 1347 (D. Hawaii, 1995)
Robinson v. City of Friendswood
890 F. Supp. 616 (S.D. Texas, 1995)
Arsenia Tolentino, and v. Lawrence Friedman, and Cross-Appellee
46 F.3d 645 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
Azar v. Hayter
874 F. Supp. 1314 (N.D. Florida, 1995)
United States v. City of Taylor, Mich.
872 F. Supp. 423 (E.D. Michigan, 1995)