Hubbard v. United States

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 6, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-00962·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JARED HUBBARD, Case No. 1:23-cv-00962-JLT-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 27) On September 5, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Dated: _ September 6, 2024 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hubbard v. United States, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Hubbard v. United States (Hubbard v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)