Hubbard v. State
This text of 11 Ind. 554 (Hubbard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an indictment returned at the April term, 1852, for retailing spirituous liquors without license. Trial and conviction at the October term of that year. At the said October term, motions to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, and to quash the indictment, were severally overruled.
The motion to dismiss was correctly overruled. Lichtenstein v. The State, 5 Ind. R. 162.
The indictment did not state the quantity of liquor sold, nor for what price. The motion to quash should have been sustained. Segur v. The State, 6 Ind. R. 451.—Divine v. The State, 4 id. 240.
The judgment is reversed, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Ind. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hubbard-v-state-ind-1859.